Taj Uddin (2010)

Taj Uddin (2010)

PIBA London
Membership Status: Barrister - Full Member Qualified in 2010 Public Access Accredited

Profile

General Information

Located in London, Taj Uddin travels throughout the South East and nationwide for fast and multi-track matters.

Key areas of practice include:

  • Personal Injury including RTA, EL, PL, Clin Neg, Prof Neg. Claimant & Defendant.
  • Costs, particular experience in Clin Neg Defence Costs.
  • Property & Chancery including Equity / Trusts, particular experience in trusts arising from transfer of substantial assets within a family / friends / carers.
  • Ancillary Relief (Financial Disputes following Divorce)
  • Commercial including Company & Family Business.

Personal Style:

Having qualified as a commercial solicitor in a city firm and founded a tech startup, he is particularly apt at giving commercially practical advice within set timescales.  He relishes working on cases from the outset and developing a relationship and strategy with instructing solicitors.

Wide range of experience:

Taj Uddin has undertaken a wide range of instructions and remains keen to maintain a broad range of expertise in the areas that interest him.

About Taj Uddin:

2005, Mansfield College, University of Oxford. 2009, qualified as a solicitor at CMS Cameron McKenna LLP (London). 2010, qualified as a Barrister. 2013, public access accredited. Past member of Guildhall Chambers, Portsmouth. Previously a Co-founder of a tech startup dealing with relationships between Landlords and Tenants.

Personal:

Taj has made it to the top of Ben Nevis, Mount Kilimanjaro and Cathedral Peak! Previously worked with and current supporter of A4ID in Tanzania www.a4id.org.

  • Personal Website: www.tajuddin.co.uk
  • Blog: www.tajuddin.co.uk/blog

Cases Include:

  • Contract Law / Partnership Law: Fuller v Guillaumes Gosling and Wilkinson
  • Contract Law / Civil Procedure: Elhag v Swift Freights UK Ltd
  • Contract Law / Capacity of Signing Part: [Debtor v Creditor] re Hamid v Francis Bradshaw Partnership
  • Chancery / Equity: Bishop v Bishop re presumed resulting trusts and recovering gifts to family

Appeals

  • Khaira v Service Underwriting, successfully appealed a strike out for Claimant's non-attendance a trial
  • Ogboogu v AIG, successfully appealed a disapplication of QOCS
  • ongoing matter, appealing on the meaning of a part 36 offer

Feedback:

"Taj is a focused colleague, always keeping core goals in sight and passionate about products but honest in setting realistic targets.  He also has an effective and collegiate style of management.  I have met few people who are so proactive, dedicated and sincere in their efforts to move things forward."  Dawood Ahmed, Previously a Co-Director, now an Energy Lawyer / Academic / Political Commentator / Entrepreneur

Testimonials

Testimonials

Fees and Feedback

Fees and Feedback

FEES:

Details regarding our approach to fees can be found at the following link:  http://www.clerksroom.com/content-html?cid=336

SERVICES:

Please see “profile” tab for description of the legal services provided by this barrister.

We aim to complete and return all paperwork within 14 days (2 weeks) of receipt if no specific deadline is provided. We can work to much faster timescales if requested or we can agree a specific target date for each individual circumstance. We will always advise at the outset if counsel is unable to meet any deadline.

Each barrister has a standard hourly rate for their work. The individual hourly rate can be agreed when instructions are acknowledged if preferred. We welcome early discussion as to the suitability of a specific barrister for a specific case. The right barrister will have the relevant expertise to deal with the case but will not be too junior, or too senior depending on the complexities.

We aim to allocate all cases to the correct level of experience & seniority which we believe will prove most to be the most cost effective solution for our clients.

If, due to urgency, we allocate paperwork to a more senior member of Clerksroom, we will charge the appropriate hourly rate for the work, not for the barrister. We welcome early discussion to ensure the correct fee is applied to the case at the outset.

REDRESS:

All our barristers are regulated by the Bar Standards Board (BSB) and hold a current practising certificate, details can be found at the following link Barristers’ Register

Complaints information

If you are not satisfied with the service provided, you can make a complaint to Chambers. Information on the chambers’ complaints procedure is available at the following link: http://www.clerksroom.com/content-html?cid=416

If you are not satisfied with the response you receive from my chambers, you can make a complaint to the Legal Ombudsman. You must contact the Legal Ombudsman either within 6 months following the conclusion of our handling your complaint, within 6 years from the date of the act/omission, or 3 years from the date that you should reasonably have known there were grounds for complaint (if the act/omission took place before the 6 October 2010 or was more than six years ago).

The Legal Ombudsman’s details are as follows:

Legal Ombudsman
PO Box 6806
Wolverhampton
WV1 9WJ
Tel: 0300 555 0333
Email: enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk
Web: www.legalombudsman.org.uk

The Bar Standards Board regulates barristers and specialised legal services businesses in England and Wales, and would like to ask you about the information you found on your legal services provider’s website. Your response will help to inform future changes in this area.   

This survey should take 5-10 minutes to complete. Your responses will be kept anonymous and confidential, not shared with your legal services provider and only used for research purposes.

If you complete this survey and provide the Bar Standards Board with your e-mail address, you will be entered into a prize draw to win a £100 Amazon voucher.

Can't find what you are looking for or prefer to talk? Call Us On 01823 247 247